PDA

View Full Version : What is REALLY in your dog's food!!!




Amaze
02-07-2005, 04:37 PM
PET FOOD - OUR PETS ARE DYING FOR IT
IS THIS YOUR PET? READ ON!
By: Sandra Brigola

"Every time a pet trustingly eats another bowl of high sugar pet food, he is being brought that much closer to diabetes, hypoglycemia, overweight, nervousness, cataracts, allergy and death"

R.Geoffrey Broderick DVM



The multi-billion dollar pet food industry is killing our pets. With millions of dollars to spend on promotion and hype, pet owners have become victims of their marketing ploys. The expression "It's a dog eat dog world" is an apt description of the pet food industry.



Millions of euthanized pets from humane shelters and veterinary hospitals all across the United States and Eastern Canada are being recycled back into pet foods.



How does this come about? It is done through a process called rendering, Prior to World War 11, most slaughterhouses were all inclusive, that is - livestock was slaughtered and processed into fresh meat in one location; including rendering. During the years after World War 11, the meat industry became more specialized. A slaughterhouse just slaughtered and dressed the carcasses and the rendering of slaughter waste became a separate specialty - and no longer within the jurisdiction of government meat inspectors. Rendering companies are entities unto their own and service many slaughterhouses, plus process any other animal waste that can be rendered. Recent figures state that the US meat industry produces over 30 billion pounds of by-products per year in 286 plants nationwide.



In a September, 1995 article titled What's Cooking , Baltimore City Paper takes their readers through Valley Proteins, Baltimore's only rendering plant with very graphic pictures of dead animals stuffed into barrels, one picture shows a dead dog ; another is of fried animal parts! Neil Gagnon, general manager of Valley Proteins says that 150 million pounds of rotting flesh are fed into the plants grinders and cookers each year to produce 80 million pounds of the plants three products; meat and bone meal, tallow and yellow grease. Most goes into chicken feed, the rest into dry pet food.



The use of dead pets, work animals,zoo animals and wildlife as raw material is an aspect of the rendering process that Gagnon doesn't like to discuss. Valley Proteins sells inedible animal parts and rendered material to Alpo,Heinz and Ralston Purina among other pet food makers. He further states that the meat and bone meal made at the plant includes materials from pets and wildlife and about 5% goes into dry pet foods.



Closer to home, just outside Seattle is a rendering facility cleverly disguised as Baker Commodities. Their raw material again is collected from veterinary hospitals and humane societies across Washington State. Seattle humane shelters have their clients sign a waiver indicating that pet's bodies not collected by their owners will be sent to the rendering facility.

Baker Commodities, a facility which is guarded like Fort Knox, sells meat meal by the ton - average price is over $200.00 per ton. The majority of their product goes to American Nutrition of Ogden Utah which manufacturers over 175 different private label brands of pet food. Some product names you may be familiar with are Alpho, Kal Kan, Albertson's, Western Family and Atta -Boy.



One of the largest rendering facilities is owned by Colgate Palmolive , who incidentally own Hills Science Diet Pet Food.



Raw material from slaughterhouses is composed of material unfit for human consumption, this includes cancerous tumors, offal, fecal matter, mammary glands, feathers etc. The raw material is then denatured to prevent it from going back into the human food change. Denaturing can be done with carbolic acid, creosote, fuel oil, kerosene or citronella. In Canada, a proprietary chemical Birkolene B is used. In addition to the above raw materials supermarket meats, restaurant leftovers, flea collars from dead pets, cattle insecticide patches, pesticides and plastic bags and wrapping from these items are all combined in these toxic soups. Rendering personnel say " it is far too costly to cut off flea collars or unwrap spoiled steaks! " This whole mess is loaded into batch cookers that are fed continuously non stop, 24 hours a day, seven days a week as meat is melted away from the bones in the hot soup. During this cooking process, the soup produces a fat of yellow grease or tallow that rises to the top and is skimmed off. The cooked meat and bone is sent to a hammer mill press, which squeezes out the remaining moisture and pulverizes the product into a gritty powder. Shaker screens sift out excess hair and large bone chips. Once the batch is finished , all that is left is yellow grease, and meat and bone meal. This is what is used as a source of animal protein that goes into pet food and poultry, swine and cattle food.



In the veterinary text book, Euthanasia of the Companion Animal (1988), in the chapter headed , Animal Disposal: Fact and Fiction by David Cook, Cook states that "millions of America's deceased pets are being cooked and processed into pet food, most pet owners don't realize this fact. Does this raise questions of ethics that should be answered by the veterinary profession and the pet food industry?" Cook goes on to say, " Consider the introduction of dogs and cats into the human food chain by way of livestock food made from rendered by-products. What happens to all those toxic products that we use so liberally on our pets?"



Aside from the moral and ethical issues, this is the dilemma of recycling pets, road kill, and diseased animals of all types into the human and pet food chain.




lilblizzardchic
02-07-2005, 06:41 PM
that is nasty

Hercules Momma
02-09-2005, 07:58 PM
Oh My... that's sick and wrong!

Romans Mom
02-13-2005, 04:13 PM
They are foul places. A little O/T with the dog food issue, but to add to this, it's also used to make asprin, make-up/cosmetics, hair gel/hair care products, sasauge casings, meal is used for varment deterrants (deer, rabbits, rats, etc.), used for fertilizers,and Rx's (drugs) are held together with this "animal-by products" after rendering. Gross!

momof1chi
02-20-2005, 11:19 PM
This Is Just Sick And Wrong!

Amaze
02-21-2005, 02:47 PM
At Three Dog Bakery, we call it "Dead, Diseased, and Dying," and it is a TRUE fact for MOST of the major-labelled pet foods out there. Even those that claim to be organic (like Paul Newman's Organics) are not. Notice the "s" at the end of OrganicS? By trademarking that, they don't have to actually have to produce an organic dog food-they can use one ingredient that is (usually the FILLER-the ORGANIC husks and shells not edible for humans) and then whatever else they want instead!

2Chiwawa
02-22-2005, 08:14 PM
Ok Sammi Girl is allergic and is on a fish and potato prescription dog food that Gracie eats also. I have to admit that I never read the ingredients but I will now. :cry2: I have no idea what else is in there. I thought if it was prescription it would be a better food. So I never looked. I was just glad that Sammi stopped getting hives.

Amaze
02-22-2005, 09:17 PM
Ok Sammi Girl is allergic and is on a fish and potato prescription dog food that Gracie eats also. I have to admit that I never read the ingredients but I will now. :cry2: I have no idea what else is in there. I thought if it was prescription it would be a better food. So I never looked. I was just glad that Sammi stopped getting hives.

What is important is that Sammi is feeling good and not having any allergic reactions! I thought that Heuser was allergic to chicken and the vet I took him too said something about changing proteins, so we tried lamb and rice for a while, but after a few months, his gas bubbles were back-I've since learned that it is not necessarily the protein that dog's react to but the quality of the meat and the pet food industry is NOT one of the topics thoroughly discussed in most veterinary schools.

Another trick to the dog food industry is the brag about "No By-Products" and make sure that the first ingredient is chicken, turkey, etc. What they don't tell you is that most of the time, the chicken and turkey are the animals rejected by the USDA for human consumption and sent on down the line to the rendering plant. As the truth gets out there and consumers insist on a change by only supporting the brands that properly handle the products that are put into our animals' food, more companies will change their practices and increase their quality levels.

Capri
03-09-2005, 11:14 PM
I reposted this from the topic where someone wanted to feed their dog a homemade or raw diet:

Ozi, no wonder your dog's are doing better now. Any food is better than Science Diet. That stuff is garbage. No offense though, because we always go for well known brands like Iams and Eukanuba and then find they are really bad for your dog.

alicia, try better foods and your dog's may eat then. Petsmart sells Dick Van Patten's Natural Balance and I recommend the chicken w/carrots and potatoes (canned). Chicken Soup for the Dog Lover's Soul is great too. You have to go to the internet sites to use their store locators to find who sells some of the better products like Solid Gold and Wellness. For Wellness, you would have to do a search of their company called Old Mother Hubbards. I go to 3 stores to get my dog's food. No one sells all three that I like. Then there is Merrick. They make this Grammy's Pot Pie with red jacket potatoes, carrots and I think snow peas. It's all real chicken chunks that you may have to cut up for tiny chi mouths.

Since we have small dogs, we can afford ultra premium brands. Canned is better than hard food. It tastes better, has better ingredients, less preservatives and more protein once you subtract the moisture from the can. These better foods have less grains than grocery store, and Petsmart foods and hard foods, plus they don't have by products.

There are two ways to serve non canned or bagged foods. You can make home made and raw. You have to be careful with raw meats to keep them at a certain temperature so they won't develope bacteria. With both home made foods that you cook or raw diets, you really need to do a lot of research to give the dogs the proper ratio of protein to veggies, then they need vitamin supplements.

When I say home made, I mean cooked food, meats and veggies. Freezing and defrosting foods kills vitamins. You can still do that, but it's all so much work and they would need more vitamins. I think you need a scale to properly proportion out the amount of each protein and veggie they need to serve a balanced meal.

Try some better canned foods first.

Pedigree is a big name food, it has nitrates in it. That the cancer causing stuff in bacon, ham and frankfuters. These big name brands stink. You need to go to natural pet food stores and read a lot.

I have a great article on dog food that is a real eye opener, but I can't get into it right now. When I can, I will post it. It's a better article than the one posted here and tells you everything about how the food is made and what's in it.

Amaze
03-10-2005, 12:37 AM
Since we have small dogs, we can afford ultra premium brands. Canned is better than hard food. It tastes better, has better ingredients, less preservatives and more protein once you subtract the moisture from the can. These better foods have less grains than grocery store, and Petsmart foods and hard foods, plus they don't have by products.

Try some better canned foods first.



Please stop advising this-it is not only wrong, but could be detrimental to our dogs health.

*See my post in MAIN under "Help Chili has Poo Poo Breath"

Capri
03-10-2005, 01:16 AM
Here is an article that plainly explains about hard foods vs. canned foods.

http://www.api4animals.org/79.htm

It will explain a lot of things to new people that are just buying dogs or to people that buy food based on a companies advertising budget.

Amaze
03-10-2005, 01:19 PM
Here is an article that plainly explains about hard foods vs. canned foods.

http://www.api4animals.org/79.htm

It will explain a lot of things to new people that are just buying dogs or to people that buy food based on a companies advertising budget.

Capri-I take offense that you would imply that I am either new to dogs or basing my opinions on advertising. Perhaps you are the one that needs to do a bit more research. I for one, work for the company that helped start the "new" revolution of healthy, quality dog food back in the 80's and we were the FIRST (and still one of the few) that use 100% Human Quality ingredients-USDA inspected for human consumption. Talk about myths, even some of the "good" dog foods are misleading-I won't get into that. Let's just say that some of the above mentioned DO use better ingredients, but STILL use products NOT fit for human consumption-it is just TOO expensive for most of them to mass produce.

I agree that many vets do not have the proper education and are often sold-to by dog food manufactures and popular belief-but that is becoming less of an issue as they too learn about nutrition options. I should know, I was a Veterinary Assistant and witnessed our vets come around to the idea.

PS-Where in the article does it state that canned is better than dry? I must have missed it and I'd like to know.

Capri
03-10-2005, 04:12 PM
H&T, I did not by any means imply that you are new to dogs or are basing your opinions on advertising. To the general public, they are familar with the major store brands that are more popular through advertizing and not for their good ingredients. Doesn't Eukanuba sponser some pet shows? That food is not great, but the name is out there for millions of people to see.

You will never find me putting anyone down ever on this board. Sometimes in writing on the internet, things can be mispercieved. I think I need to use smiley faces more often:)

About the canned food vs. hard food, it's all in that link I posted above yours. Unfortunately, the information is not listed as canned vs. hard, but talks about the differences as the article goes along. I've read this type of article over and over about the differences between canned vs. dry.

I don't put people down for feeding dry. Some people have many dogs or big dogs and can't afford the big prices of these ultra premium pet foods. I just stress it here, because we have small dogs.

Capri
03-10-2005, 05:02 PM
Here is another link to "selecting" your pet's food:

http://www.api4animals.org/689.htm

It mentions that hard food does not clean teeth, and I have seen this written many times before. If you only feed hard food to clean teeth, then it's the worse thing that you can do for your pet since I believe from everything I've read that canned food is better. Why not feed better food and just clean your dogs teeth? Dog food companies also advertise on their dog biscuits that they clean teeth too.

My dog never ate a dog biscuit in her life. She doesn't like them, and I don't like what's in them, plus she only ate canned foods and her teeth have very little tartar on them at 3 years old.

Amaze
03-11-2005, 12:10 AM
About the canned food vs. hard food, it's all in that link I posted above yours. Unfortunately, the information is not listed as canned vs. hard, but talks about the differences as the article goes along. I've read this type of article over and over about the differences between canned vs. dry.

I don't put people down for feeding dry. Some people have many dogs or big dogs and can't afford the big prices of these ultra premium pet foods. I just stress it here, because we have small dogs.

We must be reading different articles. The one I read was about poor quality, cereal foods, i.e. most name-brand kibbles. I did NOT see any mention of the kibbles properly produced with high-quality ingredients, important vitamins and minerals, and baked at low temperatures to dry them out but not leach them of their nutrients. The article did touch on many good points of labeling, etc. and for canned was quite informative. But I never deducted that "canned is better the hard" from the author's points of consideration.

Not that it matters, but I spend more now then I did on my two large dogs that I had growing up. They are on a mixture of three different organic, all-natural, kibbles; two wet/canned foods, and a variety of additions like cottage cheese, vegetables, hard boiled egg yolks, low-sodium baby food, tuna, and salmon. One thing that everyone seems to agree on is that there is NO such thing as a "complete" diet, so I use variety that helps combate any missing nutrients from my dogs' diet.

Capri
03-11-2005, 02:28 AM
H&T, I don't fault anyone for feeding hard food if you have big dogs or many dogs, but I attribute it to cost and not the quality of the food, agree to disagree???? I also believe in mixing it up and feed Capri different varieties and brands of food.

I posted two different links though they both look the same but are to different article. I wonder if you read the one about canned foods and hard foods and how they are made. I'll try to remember what was good about canned foods. They contain better ingredients, less grains, aren't sprayed with chicken fat to make it taste better, have less preservatives, but since foods are using better preservatives, it may be a moot point. Ugh! I don't want to read that article again. It's so long and my memory is so short. The protein is higher in canned foods once you do the math and subtract the moisture content, though Innova Evo kibble is very high in protein, and even gives a lot of dogs the runs. The article and others have said hard foods have a level of bacteria. I can't think anymore, it's been a kind of bad day for me and very long.

Oh wait, I didn't address your mentioning that there are better fhard oods, but I have a lot of trail pkgs and they do seem to have a lot more grains than canned food. Some companies do make grainless products for allergic dogs.

ozi-chichi's
03-11-2005, 02:32 AM
....